Employee-Shareholder Reasonable Compensation

In addressing the issue of employee-shareholder reasonable compensation in the Menard Inc. tax court case, the Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit rejected the Tax Court's multi-factor approach in favor a single “independent investor” test. Under the independent investor test, if a hypothetical independent investor would consider the rate of return on his investment to be far higher than he had any reason to expect, the compensation paid is presumptively reasonable [regarding whether the compensation is unreasonably high, in the case of a C-corporation]. However, the presumption may be rebutted by evidence that the company's success was the result of extraneous factors, such as an unexpected discovery of oil under the company's land, or that the company intended to pay the owner/employee a disguised dividend rather than salary. Menard Inc. v Commissioner (CA 7 3/10/2009).